Moot Contract "Comparative Study"

This study aimed at identifying the legal implications of moot behaviors in jurisprudence and judiciary. The comparative analytical descriptive approach has been adopted in the preparation of this study. The researcher has analyzed a number of legal texts in a number of Arab legislation, particularly in Jordan and Egypt to find out their directions on the subject and develop the criteria that they adopted in explaining the legal implications of moot. The researcher has displayed the view of jurisprudence in cases not provided for by law, looking for the considerations underlying each direction in showing the implications thereof. Despite the difficulty of access to the resolutions on the subject, the researcher has also highlighted the position of the Arab judiciary of moot and its implications, in addition to the basis adopted by the courts in making these decisions. In the end, the study has stated that indicating the implications of moot -though difficult- is very important, as it has to address the gaps in the legal texts relating to moot. The researcher hasn't biased to a specific jurisprudential view, but he has displayed the advantages and disadvantages of each of them. Moreover,the researcher has considered justice and the prior right of parties to know the legal implications of the actions they make, in addition to maintaining the judicial stability through avoiding the conflict of judicial decisions in similar issues. The study has concluded that the legal texts regulating the subject of moot must be modified in order to avoid defects and eliminate gaps therein.