Extracting the Speeches Hadeeth are Mentioned in Fath Al-Bare the Explantion of Sahih Al-Bukhari from the Book of Al Khawf to the Book Taqseer As-Salah

Thank God and the Prayer and Peace are on our Prophet From my research came out to me various summaries and notes, general and Particular. 1. Right and all right is the generous Qura'n and the Two corrects It is completely rare, afterwards, to find other document. Generally doesn't exist. I fit is found, it could be completeness or clarification. 2. Fateh Al Bary's book is magnificent and of a great value. But this book contains numerous is formation which could be summarized, omitted of simplified so that its benefit could be spread on the worlds. 3. I Know and confess that Ben Hager is a rare and scientific encyclopedia in the history of the Islamic world. I don't think that anybody could reach any Percentage to what he reached. But the confession about this fact is a thing and the ability of contravention is something else. I don't believe, also, that Ben Hager's scientific value could be affected by one criticism or two on the other hoed, I don't believe that any Person who disagrees with him intends to affect his position. I don't believe, that criticism is the same as evaluation. He who criticizes can't evaluates. From summaries that researcher states his notes. But it is obvious that it is not allowed that when these notes are understood, to be summarized and introduced for criticism only, as if the main work of the researcher is criticism. 4. It is not allowed in the scientific field to deprive anybody from his right to express his ideas. There ideas may be wrong but it could be right, It may be right but it is supposed to be wrong. 5. There is no restriction to discuss axioms; But why are some people afraid of discussing them? Are they so weak that nobody may remember them and study them? I don't think so. Are some people afraid of facts to be changed? Or to be afraid that mountains could be devastated? If these realities were in that level of weakness or they mere a letter, they should go away. 6. The history of breach, diligence, criticism and irregularity are very old and still existed. But people who carried these ideas and some who doubted the existence of God, all are useless. Does these ideas change anything? 7. I saw that Ben Hager's method is between moderation, intermediation and Kinney. But it is near to the leniency. 8. The speeches which I studied, the Book of Fearand the Book of shortening Prayare nearly (212) from Moslemor Burkhartand no important addition to them. Thus (188) Speeches had remained. 9. More than one third of the (212). Speeches proved to be weak. I am not very firm towards what had lasted, they may be found correct. He who worked hard but he is mistaken will have one reward if he has a good faith; but he will be double rewarded if he is found right. 10. Ben Hager had judgment a number of these speeches around: or more of that. But he left the rest without judgment. 11. I agree with Ben Hager in his judgment on a number of speeches around one – tenth of the number he mentioned. But I disagree with him in his judgment on the rest. 12. I found no speech that Ben Hager weakened, could be corrected. What had happened was on the contrary.